Use this for letting ARPANSA know you have a problem with EMR.

Addressing community concerns and encouraging smart meter acceptance The delay in completing the smart meter rollout was also impacted by the active refusal of customers, based on concerns relating to health or for other reasons

Now that we have the attention of Tim Wilson, I think it would be good if we get many others to write to Tim so that he can see that it is real issue and it is not restricted to 1 or 2 people. I would try to limit the response to 2 pages covering off what sets you off, what impact it has had on your life and what you are looking for (recognition of EHS by the Australian Government, Consideration for our human rights to health, to not be tortured, accessibility, discrimination etc., establishment of white zones, and remove WiFi from schools and hospitals). Please pass on to other EHS people. It is only through numbers do we have a chance to initiate change.

We aim to provide a service bridging the gap between sufferers of electrical hypersensitivity and the general public, neighbours, doctors and teachers.

Stop downplaying the health effects and cancer risks from RF EMF radiation! Please move Radio Frequency (RF) electromagnetic fields (EMFs) from Class 2b "Possible Human Carcinogen" to Class 1, "Carcinogenic to Humans" now!

The latest study has come back showing that mobile phones do cause cancer.

Electric power companies [ComEd] made a dreadful mistake when they elected to install Wireless Smart Meters to measure electrical power. Wherever these meters are installed, they threaten the health of all residents in the community, violate their privacy, increase the likelihood of hacking, decrease their personal security and safety, and threaten property values in the community. And Wireless Smart Meters do all of this without any persuasive evidence of any financial benefit to the customers.

Cell Phones & Wireless Technologies: Should Safety Guidelines Be Strengthened

Vodafone and Optus have used their powers to COMPULSORILY ACQUIRE (*) the use of the property at 92-96 Merthyr Road to install a very large mobile phone tower

so all the information provided here is for general guidance only

Basic information for the public on radiation problems

We, Australian citizens are appalled by the action taken by the ABC to retract the Catalyst episode that investigated potential health risks of wireless devices, titled “Wi-Fired?” and suspend the talented science journalist Dr. Maryanne Demasi. ABC’s Audience & Consumer Affairs report is bogus. It has distorted facts to unfairly condemn the Catalyst program.

The Academy for Environmental Sickness (TAFES) is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization. TAFES is a learning institution, led by experts in the field of environmental sickness including electrical sensitivities (ES) and toxic poisonings. Our experts teach the public about the different stressors, offer solutions, and provide resources for healing from any of the health issues stemming from exposures.

We have previously commented on the many scientific mistakes in the WHO draft Monograph on radiofrequency fields and health effects. Since there has not been any reaction we have sent the following letter asking for revision. A similar letter was send to IARC asking for new cancer risk evaluation.

Stop Smart Meters! is a grassroots network of thousands of people from around California, the United States, and internationally who are taking action to defend against the erosion of our safety, health, and privacy via forced utility “smart meter” deployments. We are multi-partisan and are based in rural Plumas County, California near Reno, Nevada. The reasons that people are active in our campaign are many, but our goal is the same. An immediate safety recall of so-called “smart” meters and an end to extortionate “opt out” fees.

This bill gives the wireless industry super-rights, not intended by either Congress or the FCC and special state-level rights intended to make it almost impossible for the public to effectively argue against cell sites that are detrimental to community aesthetics and health. Communities need a voice in this process.

California urges you to veto SB277, SB792, and AB1117. These bills capitalize on fears of a nonexistent public health crisis, discriminate against select groups, and offer no sound incentives to expand public health education. They offer a myriad of major financial repercussions and implementation issues that have yet to be addressed. These problematic bills are eroding public confidence and do nothing to develop safer health practices.